I've been using PhaseOne Capture since it came out and I just hadn't see anything that was shockingly better expecially for the workflow.
I'm going to do a basic test tonight and post if anyone is interested.? Has anyone done a comparison between PhaseOne Capture 10 & Iridient? Going through old X-E1 files now, really happy with the improvements. Really enjoying IXT, it definitely addresses one of the biggest issues of Fuji at this point. I am keeping both for now, as I only convert the RAF files I need So is anyone keeping the RAF files after converting them to DNG? I don't really see a big reason to keep the RAF files. It keeps the software development and updates much simpler and more cost effective.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER FUJI PROFILES FULL#
Brian was smart in not developing a full featured Iridient Developer, instead just the RAW DNG converter which still has all the benefits of using Lr CC/PS. The IXT is a better solution, particularly if you using Lr CC/PS. We have been waiting a long time for the Iridient converter for Windows. That may be an important difference between the transformer and developer (which I have, and embeds a camera profile when importing into LR). IXT is much better in the respect of lens corrections, so I always leave this on too. The IXT RAW converted file has all the Fuji film simulations as normal. I've been applying the simulation to the tiff/dng in LR after doing the demosaicing/sharpening in IXT. Iridient Developer in now available for Windows !!!Īssuming you send out the images to Iridient before making any changes to the files in LR, once the TIFF/DNG comes back, are you able to use the film sim profiles built in to LR, or will LR only apply them to an RAF file?.